Regulatory Risks – Licensing, Compliance & Policy Uncertainty

Regulatory risks arise from government regulations, licensing requirements, and policy changes that can delay, increase costs, or even derail infrastructure projects.

Types of Regulatory Risks

Loading diagram…

1. Licensing & Clearance Delays

The Challenge

Infrastructure projects require 15-25 different clearances from multiple authorities:

Total Time: Easily 2-3 years if done sequentially!

Impact

• Construction delays: Cannot start work without clearances
• Cost escalation: ₹10-20 crore per month cost of delay for large projects
• Interest During Construction (IDC): Accumulates, increasing project cost
• Frustrated lenders: May walk away from deal

Example - Power Plant

Project: 1,000 MW coal power plant

Clearances Required: 23 Planned Time: 18 months Actual Time: 36 months (delay of 18 months)

Impact:

• Construction delayed by 18 months
• IDC increased by ₹500 crore
• Coal prices increased during delay (₹200 crore additional burden)
• Total impact: ₹700 crore cost overrun = 7% of project cost!

Mitigation Strategies

1. Pre-Project Clearances:

   • Obtain all clearances before financial close
   • Make clearances a Condition Precedent for loan disbursement

2. Parallel Processing:

   • Apply for multiple clearances simultaneously (not sequentially)

3. Experienced Consultants:

   • Hire consultants who specialize in regulatory approvals
   • They know whom to approach, what documents to submit

4. Single Window Clearance:

   • Some states offer single-window mechanism
   • Example: Maharashtra's MAITRI portal

5. Sector-Specific Fast-Track:

   • Renewable energy projects get fast-tracked EC (6 months vs 12-18 months)

6. Deemed Approval:

   • Some clearances are "deemed approved" if authority doesn't respond within stipulated time

2. Tariff Regulation Risk

The Issue

Many infrastructure sectors have regulated tariffs set by regulators, not market forces:

Impact

Example - Power Distribution:

Cost of Supply: ₹7 per unit
Regulator-approved tariff: ₹5.50 per unit
Gap: ₹1.50 per unit
Annual Loss: ₹1.50 × 10 billion units = ₹1,500 crore!

Result: Many state DISCOMs are financially distressed due to tariff shortfall.

Mitigation

1. Regulatory Compact: Get written commitment from regulator on tariff formula
2. Automatic Tariff Adjustment: Link to fuel costs, inflation
3. Cost-Plus Model: Tariff covers all costs + reasonable return (12-14%)
4. Multi-Year Tariff (MYT): Tariff approved for 5 years, provides certainty
5. Government Support: Subsidy from government for shortfall

3. Policy & Regulatory Changes

Types of Changes

A. Retrospective Changes (Worst!)

Laws changed with retrospective effect - applies to past transactions.

Example:

• Retrospective Tax on Vodafone (₹20,000 crore demand)
• Scared away foreign investors from India for years

B. Sudden Policy Reversals

Examples:

• Solar Import Duty: Government imposed 25% duty on imported solar panels (2018)

  • Projects had signed contracts assuming zero duty
  • ₹1-1.5 crore/MW additional cost
  • Many projects became unviable

• Coal Linkage Cancellation: Government cancelled coal allocations to some power plants

  • Projects designed for domestic coal now must import (3x cost)

• Net Metering Changes: Changes to rooftop solar policies reduced payback

C. New Compliance Requirements

Example - Environmental:

• New wastewater treatment norms imposed
• Additional ₹50 crore CAPEX required mid-project

Impact

• Viability affected: Financial model breaks down
• Contractual disputes: Who bears the cost of policy change?
• Lender concerns: Increased risk perception
• Credit rating downgrade

Mitigation

1. Change in Law Clause (in Concession Agreement):

   • If law changes, government compensates SPV for additional costs
   • OR extends concession period
   • OR terminates contract with compensation

2. Political Risk Insurance: Covers regulatory changes (expensive, rarely used)

3. Diversification: Don't invest only in one heavily-regulated sector

4. Strong Legal Counsel: To challenge adverse changes in court

4. Environmental Compliance Risk

Ongoing Compliance

Even after getting Environmental Clearance, projects must comply with 60+ conditions:

• Monthly air/water quality monitoring
• Afforestation (plant 10 trees for every 1 cut)
• CSR activities (schools, health centers for affected villages)
• Wildlife mitigation (underpasses for animal movement)
• Dust suppression, noise control

Cost: ₹5-20 crore per year (for large projects)

Non-Compliance Consequences

• Fines: ₹25 lakh to ₹10 crore
• Stop Work Order: Project operations halted
• Imprisonment: Directors can be jailed (rare, but possible)
• Cancellation of Clearance: Project shut down permanently

Example - Mining Project:

• Environmental clearance cancelled due to violations
• ₹3,000 crore project abandoned
• Lenders took 100% loss on debt

Mitigation

1. Dedicated Environmental Cell: 5-10 person team for compliance
2. Third-Party Audits: Annual environmental audits
3. Overcompliance: Exceed norms to create buffer
4. Insurance: Environmental liability insurance
5. Strong Monitoring Systems: Real-time air/water quality monitors

5. Labor & Safety Regulations

• Contractor Labor Act compliance
• Minimum wages: State-specific, changes annually
• Safety regulations: Hard hats, safety training, ambulances
• Provident Fund, ESI: For all workers

Cost: 15-20% of labor cost Non-compliance: Work stoppages, fines, criminal liability

India-Specific Regulatory Challenges

Multi-Level Approvals

• Central Government: Environmental, forest, wildlife clearances
• State Government: Land, water, electricity, building permits
• Local Bodies: Trade license, property tax clearance
• Specialized Agencies: Airport Authority, Port Trust, etc.

Coordination Challenge: 15 different offices, each with own timelines!

Lack of Single Window

• Promised but not effectively implemented in most states
• Each clearance requires separate application, documents

Discretion with Officials

• Many clearances are discretionary, not automatic
• Susceptible to delays, rent-seeking

Case Study: Land Acquisition Delays

Project: 6-lane expressway, 150 km

Land Required: 1,200 acres

Challenges:

1. Land owned by 3,000+ farmers (fragmented holdings)
2. Market rate: ₹20 lakh/acre
3. Farmers demanding: ₹50 lakh/acre (2.5x)
4. Litigation by farmers in High Court
5. Environmental group opposing (forest land involved)

Timeline:

• Planned: 12 months
• Actual: 48 months (4 years!)

Impact:

• Construction delayed by 3 years
• Cost escalation: ₹400 crore
• Lenders invoked covenant, demanded additional equity
• Equity IRR dropped from 18% to 12%

Resolution:

• Higher compensation negotiated (₹35 lakh/acre)
• Government provided additional land (forest clearance obtained)
• Project finally completed, but financially stressed

Summary

• Regulatory risk is one of the top 3 risks in Indian infrastructure
• 15-25 clearances required, taking 2-3 years
• Tariff regulation: Regulators may not approve adequate tariffs
• Policy changes: Retrospective laws, import duties, coal linkage changes
• Environmental compliance: 60+ ongoing conditions, non-compliance can shut project
• Mitigation: Pre-financial close clearances, Change-in-Law clauses, experienced consultants
• Single Window Clearance: Promised but not effectively implemented
• Land acquisition: Often the biggest delay (3-4 years common)

Quiz Time! 🎯

Loading quiz…

Next Chapter: Political Risks – Expropriation, Instability & Sovereign Risk! 🏛️